there is no scientific support in peer-reviewed literature for the proposition that wind turbines cause any adverse health effects in humans.That is a meaningless statement, since there is also no scientific support in peer-reviewed literature (i.e., original epidemiological research) for the proposition that wind turbines do not cause any adverse health effects.
Therefore, the consistent direct testimony from around the world must stand as strong evidence that there are indeed adverse health effects for many people who live near giant wind turbines.
What Judge Sheehy really said was:
I know that some people get sick from wind turbines, and the county rules would do a lot to protect them. But my job is to add an official state government "fuck you" to that of the developers.
Also in the same issue, another item notes "Rising Temps Won't Affect Production", describing an analysis of how rising temperatures might affect wind energy over the nest 30-50 years.
Unspoken is the necessary converse: Rising wind energy production won't affect global warming.
wind power, wind energy, wind turbines, wind farms, environment, environmentalism, human rights
